Apple's plans to conquer the augmented reality market with an AR headset called the Vision Pro, which costs three and a half thousand dollars a piece.
I don't believe that's really true.
Yes, the Vision Pro appears to be better than the other headsets on the market. It looks alright on your head, if you don't mind wearing ski goggles. It's technically far more advanced than anything else we've seen. And it has the strength of Apple's ecosystem behind it, meaning there will be thousands of apps for this thing in about a year.
But from the comments I've seen online, most people are stuck on the price. Rightfully so: At $3,499, the Vision Pro is far more expensive than comparable headsets, such as Meta's $499.99 Quest 3, and the $999.99 Meta Quest Pro. Frankly, it's not even in the same category, and I can imagine many a VR/AR enthusiasts throwing their hands up in disgust when they heard Apple's price tag for the Vision Pro. Even the price of Apple stock sharply declined during the Vision Pro announcement, likely because the market thinks that a very pricy headset is not something that will do wonders for Apple's revenue.
SEE ALSO: How many Apple products can you buy for one Vision Pro headset?The price is high for a reason, and it may not be what you think. Yes, the Vision Pro probably costs a fortune to produce. With an M2 and a new R1 chip inside, a dozen cameras, and a bunch of sensors, it surely costs Apple quite a bit of money to make this beast.
But the real reason why Apple has launched a headset this powerful and this expensive, I think, is that this one is not meant for the masses. It's a device for developers, and perhaps a handful of enthusiasts, to play with. Apple surely doesn't expect to sell millions of these at $3,499 a piece.
In fact, I bet that Apple doesn't even wantto sell too many. The company may not be able to produce the headset at very high volume, but even more importantly, Apple probably doesn't want the Vision Pro to be in too many hands until the numerous new experiences it offers are significantly refined.
Consider the launch date, too. According to Apple, the Vision Pro will launch "early next year." Reader, it's early June. This means that there's at least a six month wait until the Vision Pro is even available; possibly a few months more. Apple typically doesn't announce products this early before general availability. Another thing: The Vision Pro will initially be available only in the U.S., with more countries coming "later next year" according to Apple. That could mean that many potential users will have to wait a year or more until they can buy the headset.
Prior to the launch of Vision Pro, we've heard rumors that Apple actually has one or even two more headsets in the pipeline. Now that the Vision Pro is out, this makes even more sense to me. A cheaper version of the headset – reportedly costing roughly as much as an iPhone – could come in 2024. And that one, launching when there's already a healthy third party app ecosystem for Apple's virtual world, will be the headset that Apple expects to sell by the millions.
My point here is that there's little reason to get mad at the Vision Pro's exorbitantly high price tag. The Vision Pro is a technology showcase, a device that shows the world what can be done with AR when you have a lot of research and development money to spend (Apple says it filed over 5,000 patents related to the Vision Pro). The actual Apple headset that us common folks should even consider buying is the one that comes after the Vision Pro.
Copyright © 2023 Powered by
Apple Vision Pro is incredibly expensive, but not for the reason you think-声闻过情网
sitemap
文章
3613
浏览
8
获赞
322
Sophie Turner chugging wine on a Jumbotron is deeply inspiring
Game of Thronesstar Sophie Turner (also known as Sansa Stark) dabbed then chugged a glass of red winHow to spot a bot and what to do about it
So, you live and breathe online and couldn't be happier about it. But maybe, just maybe, your dailySamsung Galaxy S9 leaks in fancy new lilac purple color
Could purple be the new "in" color for smartphones?Samsung appears to think so. Prominent leaker ofAn ode to Will Smith's perfect Instagram account
If you ask me, there was only one good thing to come out of social media in 2017 and it came with thApple could debut its new laptop chip in a Macbook Pro this year
A few weeks after Apple announced it would start developing its own silicon chip for Mac computers,How the cryptocurrency market will recover
In the past month or so, bears have ruled the cryptocurrency market. You may not think that's a veryInside Center for Humane Technology: Tech creators are pushing back
They helped create Facebook, Google, and other companies who claim to bring the world together. ButMario can now ride along with you in Google Maps
Google might have outdone itself with the best Google Maps easter egg yet.The latest version of theFacebook launches 'Facebook Shops' for more in
Facebook just made it way easier to spend your money on Instagram. On Tuesday, Facebook, which ownsHow to turn off Facebook's new face recognition features
Facebook has been giving users a scare as people have started noticing a notification in its mobileSnapchat's Snap Maps is live on map.snapchat.com for Official Stories
Snapchats from all over the world can be easily viewed online. On Monday, Snapchat released map.snapComcast is increasing Xfinity internet speeds in the northeast
If you have Comcast, fasten your seatbelt. Comcast has announced that it's rolling out higher internTiger Woods won the Masters, and everybody loves a comeback
Dramatic comebacks are usually the stuff of sports movies, complete with sweeping music and tearfulSenator Ron Wyden launches inquiry into Facebook’s data
Facebook will soon provide more answers about how and why Cambridge Analytica was able to amass FaceMark Zuckerberg response to Cambridge Analytica scandal lacks apology
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has finally responded to the scandal involving data firm Cambridge Anal